{"id":4409,"date":"2026-10-12T08:57:14","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T08:57:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/?p=4409"},"modified":"2026-10-12T08:57:14","modified_gmt":"2026-10-12T08:57:14","slug":"anchor-text-strategy-in-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/anchor-text-strategy-in-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Anchor text strategy in 2026: how to stop links looking spammy"},"content":{"rendered":"

Google finished rolling out its September 2026 spam update<\/a> on 8 October. It took nearly 14 days, which is a long time for a spam update, and phase three landed around the 4th to the 6th (Search Engine Roundtable tracked the whole thing<\/a>). The sites that got shaken weren\u2019t the ones with too few links – A lot of them actually had plenty. Their problem was that every link pointed home with the exact same two or three keyword-stuffed words.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s an anchor text problem. And it\u2019s the one bit of link building people still get lazy about.<\/p>\n

What anchor text actually tells Google<\/h3>\n

Anchor text is the clickable words in a link. \u201cReformer pilates in Nottingham\u201d is anchor text. So is \u201cread more\u201d, so is a bare URL, so is your brand name.<\/p>\n

Google uses it as a context signal. When a few sites link to a page using similar language, that\u2019s a hint about what the page is about. Useful. The trouble starts when the hint looks manufactured, because real editorial links almost never line up that neatly.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s what most people miss about inbound anchors: you mostly can\u2019t pick them. When a journalist or a blogger links to you, they write whatever they want. John Mueller made this point when someone asked him about the ideal mix of inbound anchor text.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cUsually that\u2019s something you wouldn\u2019t have control over anyway.\u201d – John Mueller, Google, on Search Engine Journal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read that as a tell. If your backlink profile is full of tidy, keyword-rich anchors, Google knows a human editor didn\u2019t choose those words. You did. Or someone you paid did.<\/p>\n

\"Anchor<\/a>
Anchor Text Optimization: Step-by-Step Guide<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Why one anchor pattern gets you flagged<\/h3>\n

Ahrefs studied anchor text across 384,614 web pages<\/a>, and the pattern in natural link profiles is messy on purpose. Brand mentions<\/a>, naked URLs, random \u201cclick here\u201d links, the odd exact-match phrase. Real links are scruffy.<\/p>\n

Now picture a page where 80% of the backlinks say \u201cbest CRM software\u201d. No real editor writes like that at scale. So when a spam update runs its detection over your profile, that uniformity is a flag. Not a guarantee of a hit, but a weight on the wrong side of the scale.<\/p>\n

And it\u2019s an expensive mistake to make on purpose. BuzzStream\u2019s market data puts the average paid link insertion at around $141<\/a>, and the ones people buy almost always come with an exact-match anchor baked in, because that\u2019s what the buyer asked for. So you\u2019re paying for the exact signal that gets you flagged!<\/p>\n

The anchor types, and roughly how they should sit<\/h3>\n

There\u2019s no magic ratio. Anyone who gives you an exact percentage is guessing. But the shape of a healthy profile is well understood, so aim for variety over any single number.<\/p>\n

Brand anchors<\/h4>\n

Your business name, or your name plus a word. \u201cFLOW Reformer Studio\u201d, \u201cBecky Halls SEO\u201d. These should be your biggest bucket. Real people link to you by name all the time, and brand anchors are basically impossible to over-optimise.<\/p>\n

Naked URLs<\/h4>\n

Just the link itself, like flowreformerstudio.co.uk. Common in forum posts, directories, citations. Totally natural, and they add bulk without risk.<\/p>\n

Partial-match anchors<\/h4>\n

A phrase that includes some of your target words but reads like a human wrote it. \u201cBecky\u2019s guide to local SEO<\/a>\u201d rather than \u201clocal SEO Nottingham\u201d. This is where you get topical relevance<\/a> without the spam smell.<\/p>\n

Exact-match anchors<\/h4>\n

The target keyword, word for word. \u201creformer pilates Nottingham\u201d. These still carry weight, which is why people abuse them. Use them rarely and only where they read naturally in the sentence.<\/p>\n

Generic and topic anchors<\/h4>\n

\u201cRead the full study\u201d, \u201cthis breakdown\u201d, \u201cmore on that here\u201d. They look like nothing and they\u2019re worth more than people think, because this is how actual editors link.<\/p>\n

The quick test: read the sentence around the link out loud. If it sounds like a press release wrote it, change the anchor.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cWhen I audit a client\u2019s backlinks, I don\u2019t start with the number of links. I start with the anchors. If I see the same money phrase 30 times, I know two things straight away: someone bought those links, and we\u2019ve got cleanup to do before we build anything new.\u201d Becky Halls, Strategist 3Way.Social<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

What this means for link exchanges and partnerships<\/h3>\n

If you\u2019re building links through partnerships or exchanges, anchor text<\/a> is the part you have to actively manage, because now you do control it. That\u2019s a gift and a trap.<\/p>\n

Set a rule for your own team and your partners: brand and partial anchors by default, exact-match only when the surrounding content genuinely calls for it. Vary the wording every single time. If you\u2019re placing five links this month, they should read like five different people wrote them, because the whole point is that it looks like they did.<\/p>\n

And relevance beats the anchor every time. A link from a site your audience actually reads, with a plain brand anchor, is worth more than a keyword-perfect anchor from a site about nothing in particular.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe whole industry spent a decade treating anchor text like a slider you crank up for more rankings. That era\u2019s over. The platforms that last are the ones matching sites on relevance first and letting the anchors stay natural. Boring, maybe. But boring survives the updates.\u201d Ian Naylor, Founder 3Way.Social<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

A 20-minute anchor audit you can run today<\/h3>\n

You don\u2019t need a big budget for this. Pull your backlink profile<\/a> from Ahrefs, Semrush or Google Search Console and do four things.<\/p>\n

First, export your anchors and sort by frequency. Look at the top 10. If one keyword-rich phrase dominates, that\u2019s your risk.<\/p>\n

Second, work out roughly how much is branded. If it\u2019s a thin slice, your profile looks bought even if it isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Third, flag any exact-match anchors sitting on low-quality or irrelevant sites. Those are the ones to disavow or get removed.<\/p>\n

Fourth, before your next campaign, write out the anchors you\u2019ll use and make sure no two are the same. Takes five minutes and saves you a cleanup later.<\/p>\n

Do that once a quarter and you\u2019ll never be the site that panics every time a spam update rolls out.<\/p>\n

Anchor text strategy in 2026 – FAQ<\/h3>\n

What\u2019s a safe anchor text ratio in 2026?<\/strong>
\nThere isn\u2019t a fixed one, and I\u2019d be suspicious of anyone who quotes you exact numbers. Lean heavily on brand and naked URL anchors, use partial-match for relevance, and keep exact-match rare. Variety is the actual target, not a percentage.<\/p>\n

Can over-optimised anchor text get my site penalised?<\/strong>
\nIt can contribute. A profile where most links use the same keyword-rich anchor is a classic manipulation pattern, and spam updates look for exactly that. It\u2019s rarely the only factor, but it\u2019s an easy one to fix.<\/p>\n

Should I disavow links with bad anchor text?<\/strong>
\nOnly if they\u2019re from genuinely spammy or irrelevant sites and you can\u2019t get them removed. A few odd exact-match anchors from decent sites are normal. Don\u2019t disavow your way into a thinner, scarier-looking profile.<\/p>\n

Do internal links follow the same rules?<\/strong>
\nInternal links are different, because you control the whole site, so descriptive anchors that match the page are fine and useful there. The over-optimisation worry is mostly about inbound links from other sites.<\/p>\n

Does anchor text still matter for rankings at all?<\/strong>
\nYes. It\u2019s still a context signal. It matters less than it did in 2015, and relevance of the linking site matters more, but it hasn\u2019t gone away. Treat it as one lever among many, not the whole machine.<\/p>\n

Becky Halls is a Strategist at 3Way.Social, where she works on link building campaigns and content strategy for clients who\u2019d rather rank than gamble. She also works on Local SEO in Nottingham<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Google finished rolling out its September 2026 spam update on 8 October. It took nearly 14 days, which is a long time for a spam update,\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":3554,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-link-building","category-seo"],"modified_by":"Becky Halls","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4409"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4410,"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4409\/revisions\/4410"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3554"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/3way.social\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}